ABUJA — CHRISTIAN leaders, yesterday, opposed the Federal
Government’s plan to offer unconditional amnesty to members of the Boko
Haram sect, describing it as a misplaced priority and an unjust cause.
This came even as there is skepticism within the military circle that
the amnesty will work out, adding that it may turn out to be a
colossal failure and the Federal Government may end up embarrassing
itself over its non workability.
.
President Goodluck Jonathan
The Christian leaders asked the government to take urgent steps to
compensate and resettle victims of Boko Haram attacks instead of wasting
time and resources on a matter that would not yield any positive
results at the end of the day.
According to the leaders, the Federal Government was committing a
suicide mission by attempting to appease the sect members without their
readiness to surrender arms and seek peace with the rest of the society.
They also stated that granting amnesty to the sect would amount to
injustice and encouragement to other criminally-minded groups to strike
and seek reward from the government.
The Prelate of Methodist Church of Nigeria, Dr Sunday Ola Makinde, in an exclusive interview with Vanguard was
of the opinion that granting amnesty to the sect was like putting the
cart before the horse and a step in the wrong direction.
Makinde noted: “They are talking about amnesty without saying
anything about their victims. They are still killing people even as the
government is fine-tuning ways for amnesty.
“I am not comfortable with the government’s decision because they are
putting the cart before the horse. Why can’t we first of all dialogue
with these people and find out their grievances? The only thing that I
read in the paper is that they want to Islamize Nigeria; we know that
there are other grievances, which should be known before amnesty is
given by the government.
“Then, before amnesty is granted we want to know what they will do
for the family of the widows and widowers, their places they have
destroyed, what are they going to do for the victims and so on. Amnesty
is not the issue now, but how to ameliorate the suffering of the
victims.
“So, setting up any committee for amnesty without first looking into
how the victims could be compensated is injustice, and if there is no
justice there will be no peace.
We need dialogue
“As condition for peace, we need dialogue; dialogue will lead them to
know the group’s grievances and how to go about it. They are
politicizing it and we need to be careful, if we are not, it may lead us
to unpalatable end.”
Also speaking, the Bishop of Kubwa Anglican Diocese, the Rt Rev. Duke
Akamisoko, threw his weight behind any initiative to bring lasting
solution to the security challenges plaguing the north but warned
against the offer of amnesty to the sect.
“While we are looking at how to solve the problem, the terminology,
amnesty, is what I’m not comfortable with. If the government wants to
speak with them to know their grievances, fine! But I don’t agree that
they should be granted amnesty because of the level of havoc committed
by these persons without any remorse. What about the Christians who were
slaughtered by the sect? What about the churches that were burnt and
destroyed?” Akamisoko asked.
You are on suicide mission —Bauchi CAN
The Christian groups likened the Presidency’s action to a suicide
mission, which could at the end consume the whole nation, and asked
Jonathan to be cautious with the plan and not allow political gains to
becloud his sense of reasoning.
The Bauchi State Secretary of the Christian Association of Nigeria,
CAN, Rev. Joshua Ray Mains, described the Federal Government offer of
amnesty to Boko Haram as a suicidal strategy by President Jonathan for
the 2015 election, saying the move would never achieve its goal for
peace.
It faulted the idea of granting amnesty to a faceless group that had
wantonly destroyed lives and property of Nigerians at every turn. He
said amnesty should only be granted to people with known ideology,
identities and vision and not a sect whose membership and ideology
remain unclear.
The CAN scribe said: “The issue of granting of amnesty to the Boko
Haram group should not even arise in the first instance because up till
today nobody can actually point out who members of this group are. We
have a problem of identifying this group and I don’t think it is
rational to give amnesty to group of people you don’t know.”
He said amnesty should be given to a group of individual who had lost
a stake like the Movement for the Emancipation of Niger Delta, adding
that they had their strong reasons for amnesty such as oil exploitation,
infrastructural decay, unemployment and land degradation.
Mains asked: “Why should they be given amnesty? Are we congratulating
them for the people they have sent to their early graves or are we
encouraging them to continue with their acts so that other groups can
take advantage of the amnesty and continue to disrupt the peace of the
country?”
An exercise in futility
Reacting to the Boko Harm amnesty offer, Pastor Bitrus Bdliya of the
Church of Brethren in Nigeria described the offer of amnesty to the sect
members by the Federal Government as an exercise in futility, as the
offer would not make the boys to stop their bombing campaigns.
He wondered how the government should contemplate amnesty for Boko
Haram whose leader, Imam Abubakar Shekau, had come out publicly through
the media to reject such amnesty.
He said, it was unfortunate that some people equated Boko Haram with
the Niger Delta militias, pointing out that the two scenarios were not
the same and should not be juxtaposed for any reason.
Bdliya pointed out that while the Niger Delta militants fought for a
share of the oil being exploited in the region, Boko Haram merely wants
to kill Christians and islamise the country by force.
Also speaking, the Yobe State CAN Chairman, Reverend Idi Garba, noted
that the Federal Government attempt would amount to a waste of time and
resources as long as the sect members had not sought repentance and
forgiveness before the offer by the government.
Adamawa Christians divided over amnesty
Reverend Phineas Padio of Dunamis International Gospel Centre, Yola argued that Amnesty for the group was long overdue.
He reasoned that from all indications, the Federal Government lacked
the capacity to crush the group, so it has no alternative than to grant
amnesty for peace to reign in the land.
According to Padio, since 2010 when the President made pronouncement
that the sect would be crushed in a couple of weeks, their atrocities
had continued unabated across the north.
Phineas Padio said most of those opposing amnesty do not live in the
North, saying those that are resident in the Northern States that “wear
the shoes know how it pinches”.
On his part, Prophet Samson Sam of Christ Solution Power Chapel, Yola, said he did not support amnesty for the Boko Haram sect.
He argued that, the group is faceless and is fighting a no just cause.
He stated that the leaders of the Boko Haram should tell Nigerians
their reasons for trying to destabilize the country and not this talk of
amnesty for the terrorists.
Chairman Christian Association of Nigeria, CAN, Gombe State Chapter,
Reverend Abare Kallah, asked about the churches destroyed by Boko Haram.
According to him, “from the Christian point of view, we have been
agitating now that if President Jonathan is going to give amnesty to
Boko Haram, what happens to the churches, the people who are victims
whose lives, property were destroyed, everything that was affected as a
result of their activities.
So, we just want the president to stand on the right side of taking
the right judgment about this thing. It’s not about favouring one side.
We are also wounded. If they are thinking that amnesty is going to be
given to Boko Haram, I am sure that there is going to be another faction
or group that the Federal Government cannot contend with”.
What happens to the victims of Boko Haram insurgency
The Northern Christian Elders Forum, NOSCEF, submitted that the
decision to grant amnesty to Boko Haram “is a call to other interest
groups to rise up in arms against their fatherland, to be blessed when
such an action should be treated as treason.
Chairman of the group, Evangelist Matthew Owojaiye argued that
intimidating the Federal Government to grant amnesty is the highest
display of hypocrisy and lack of patriotism.
He said: “Are such people not indirectly admitting that they are the
shadows or ghosts behind the Boko Haram? We totally object to even
discussing amnesty when nothing has been done for the victims of the
Boko Haram.”
The statement titled; ‘Enough is Enough! Nobody should take us for
granted! said that contrary to popular belief in certain quarters, the
Christian Community in the North has been the most “marginalized,
deliberately underdeveloped group treated like vassals, seriously
brutalized and slaughtered under the watchful eyes of this regime more
than in any other regime.”
Evangelist Owojaiye alleged that “this government has spent billions
of naira on nomadic education, N5 billion on Almajiri schools which is
specifically for Muslims, while Christian schools and hospitals taken
over by the government without compensations are still held tight by
government.
Boko Haram, has tried to annihilate us and our Igbo Christian
brothers and now the government is talking about granting the Islamic
sect amnesty without saying a word about the people they bombed,
slaughtered and traumatized.”
Blame Northern Muslim elite — NOSCEF
The NOSCEF furthered argued that the Northern Muslim elite should be
held responsible for the rot in the region and not the present
administration. “Who underdeveloped the Muslim North? It is definitely
not the Jonathan Government, and neither the Christians in the North! It
is the Northern Muslim elite that impoverished the Northern Muslim
youth.
The Northern Muslim elite pocketed the largesse that came to the
North. Only they and their families benefitted. They turned the
attention of Boko Haram to the innocent Christians in the North.
“It is even more annoying that instead of the Northern Muslim elite
releasing 50 per cent of their wealth to solve the poverty problem of
the Muslim North they are crying and putting pressure and intimidating
the Federal Government to set up a Boko Haram commission,” Owojaiye
stated.
Military skeptical about success of amnesty
Meanwhile, there is skepticism within the military circle about the
success of the amnesty being proposed by President Goodluck Jonathan for
Boko Haram terrorists, arguing that it may turn out to be a colossal
failure and the Federal Government may end up embarrassing itself over
its non-workability.
Indications to this effect emerged following Vanguard’sinvestigation
which revealed that the Boko Haram sect is no longer one body but a
fragmented group that has such breakaway group like Ansaru which
recently killed two Nigerian soldiers along the Lokoja-Okene road, who
were on their way to Abuja to embark on peacekeeping mission in Mali.
The same Ansaru kidnapped a French national in a commando
style in Katsina while the most recent one is the kidnap of 11 foreign
construction workers, including Lebanese, British, Filipino and other
nationals working at a Bauchi construction site.
Aside Ansaru, there are other breakaway factions that broke
into and robbed banks and financial institutions while others carried
out killings for a price, no matter the individual or his standing in
the society.
A security source asked, “Even if you look beyond the fragmented
group of the terrorists, what happens if tomorrow, all the almajiris and
jobless street urchins troop out in their millions and say they areBoko Haram and
they want amnesty, which of course goes with a package of allowances,
rehabilitation and training. Does the government have the resources to
cater for them?
According to another source, “everywhere in the world where the issue
of amnesty for insurgency is brought to the table, that word ‘amnesty’
comes up after negotiation with the known group and its leaders have
taken place, the insurgents have agreed to surrender their arms and have
been seen to do so, before amnesty is brought in and its implementation
discussed”.
“But the situation where amnesty comes first before discussing with
those causing problems, killing, maiming, bombing and destroying whole
villages, security personnel and their stations is like sending a wrong
signal to the other groups who may want to cash in on the action of the
government”.
The source added that President Jonathan was able to convince the
Chief of Defence Staff, Admiral Ola Sa’ad Ibrahim, Chiefs of Army, Navy
and Air Staff, the Inspector General of Police and the DG Department of
State Security, DSS, to buy into the amnesty proposition despite the
fact that the shoe pinches them directly with the daily killing and
bombing of their personnel who are in the front lines of the war on
terror by telling them “let us try the option and see the outcome”.
The President was able to placate the military chiefs to further
accept and support the amnesty offer because he believes that firstly it
will do the nation a world of good if they renounce their insurgency.
Secondly, if after the amnesty is granted the Boko Haram terrorists,
its fragmented groups continue the mayhem, the government would have
been justified over its earlier stand of not dealing with faceless
groups.
“Those questioning military option will then hide their faces in
shame. Aside that, politicians who have been feasting on the Boko Haram
debacle for purposes of scoring cheap political points and gaining cheap
popularity will now know that the bigger picture of joining forces
with government and security agencies to ensure peace and stability for
the nation will benefit all the most”.
Culled: Vanguard
No comments:
Post a Comment