A fresh row may brew between the Executive and the National
Assembly over the 2013 national budget as President Goodluck Jonathan
has sent back the document to the lawmakers for amendment.
Jonathan, in separate letters to the two chambers of the National
Assembly, argued that the N4. 9tn budget could “hamper” the works of
the Executive if it was implemented as passed by the lawmakers.
The letters which accompanied the returned document were addressed to
the President of the Senate, David Mark, and the Speaker, House of
Representatives, Aminu Tambuwal. They were dated March 14, 2013.
In the Senate, it was read by the Deputy President of the Senate, Ike
Ekweremadu, who presided over the plenary on Tuesday and in the House
by Tambuwal.
Stating that he was seeking an amendment to the document to enable
him to improve the lives of Nigerians, the President said he “
appreciates” the National Assembly for passing the budget in record
time.
But he noted that certain clauses and provisions in the budget
were in conflict with the principle of Separation of Powers and
therefore asked the lawmakers to amend them in line with the
understanding both sides reached before he appended his signature to
the budget on February 27.
Specifically, the President expressed reservations about the demand
by the National Assembly that the Accountant General of the Federation
should furnish it with budget releases on a quarterly basis.
The letter reads in part, “As noted in our various consultative
meetings with the leadership and various committees of the National
Assembly following the passage of the budget, it became imperative that
certain provisions, including cuts to personnel cost across the service
and provisions for some capital projects be changed through an
amendment budget.
“In this respect,
I hereby forward a copy each, of the 2013 Amendment Budget Proposal.
It is my hope that the distinguished members will consider and approve
these revised proposals in your usual expeditious manner.”
The President cited “cuts to personnel cost across the service and
provisions for some capital projects” as some of the provisions in the
budget that needed to be amended for smooth implementation.
For the Subsidy Reinvestment and Empowerment Programme in particular,
Jonathan forwarded amendment proposals to the tune of N273.52bn to
the lawmakers.
He said, “The 2013 Appropriation Act includes clauses which may be
injurious to the spirit of separation of powers and which could hamper
the work of the Executive arm of government.
“I therefore request that these should be reviewed.”
Jonathan listed four controversial clauses in the budget, which he
urged the lawmakers to review, and gave explanations for his request.
Among them is the clause directing the Securities and Exchange
Commission not to spend any funds this year unless in a manner approved
by the National Assembly.
The President’s letter reads in part,
a. Clause 6(H) states that: “The Accountant-General of the
Federation shall forward to the National Assembly, full details of funds
released to the government agencies
immediately such funds are released while Clause 9 states that, “All
Accounting Officers of Ministries, Parastatals and Departments of
government who control heads of expenditures shall upon the coming into
effect of this Act furnish the National Assembly, on a quarterly basis,
with detailed information on the Internally Generated Revenue of the
agency in any form whatsoever”. Both clauses run counter to the
established chain of reporting;
b. Clause 7 states that, “The Minister of Finance shall
ensure that funds appropriated under this Act are released to the
appropriate agencies and/or organs of government as and when due,
provided that no funds for any quarter of the fiscal year shall be
deferred without prior waiver from the National Assembly.
“This requires the Minister of Finance to seek a waiver from the
National Assembly each time the Ministry of Finance cannot make full
funds releases to MDAs when due. As you are aware, the nation
experiences a shortfall in revenue once in a while and if the minister
is to seek a waiver on each occasion, the practice would tie down budget
implementation, as this would involve the minister writing a formal
letter to the National Assembly, presented in plenary and sent to the
relevant committees for discussion. These would create delays and
constraints on the budget implementation; and
c. Clause 10 states, “All revenue however described,
including all fees received, fines, grants, budgetary provisions and all
internally and externally generated revenue shall not be spent by the
Securities and Exchange Commission for recurrent or capital purposes or
for any other matters, nor liabilities thereon incurred except with
prior appropriation and approval by the National Assembly. Considering
the fact that the budget of the Securities and Exchange Commission does
not form part of the core 2013 Federal Budget as presented to the
National Assembly, I believe that this clause ought not to have been
inserted into the 2013 Appropriation Act in the first place.
“Secondly, the import of the clause is tantamount to shutting down
the business of the commission with a potential negative impact on the
capital market.”
The House had inserted the SEC clause in the budget after Jonathan
refused to act on its resolution demanding the sack of the
Director-General of the Commission, Ms. Arunma Oteh, for allegedly
lacking the qualifications to head the agency.
Details of the SURE-P budget showed that the Ministry of Niger Delta
would get N42.270bn to augment the funding of the East-West Road,
sections I-IV, while the Ministry of Works was given N93.5bn to fund
ongoing road projects nationwide.
Some of the roads are the Abuja-Lokoja Road, Benin-Ore–Sagamu Road,
Kano-Maidguri Road and Port Harcourt-Enugu-Onitsha Road, among others.
It will be recalled that Jonathan originally proposed a budget of
N4.924tn, but the National Assembly eventually passed a total figure of
N4.987tn , thus raising it by about N63bn on December 20, 2012.
In addition, lawmakers changed the crude oil benchmark of the budget to $79 per barrel, up from the $75 proposed by Jonathan.
They also included the controversial Clause 10 on SEC in a bid to get Jonathan to fire Oteh.
The President has yet to act on this provision.
The President and the lawmakers later had lengthy disagreements and
discussions over the content of the budget for close to 30 working days
after the details were transmitted to him.
Amidst threats by the House in particular that it would override
Jonathan’s veto, the President signed the budget on February 27.
However, it later came to the fore that he signed the document with
the understanding that he would forward an amendment version to the
National Assembly.
On reading the letter on the floor on Tuesday, lawmakers merely responded by chorusing “noted”, “ noted”.
They simply continued with other issues listed for discussion.
No comments:
Post a Comment