PARAMOUNT ruler of Siembiri Kingdom in Delta State, Pere
Charles Ayemi-Botu, aka Lion of the Niger, is one-time national chairman
of the Traditional Rulers of Oil Mineral Producing Communities of
Nigeria, TROMPCON. He had once called on President Goodluck Jonathan to
review the allocation of oil blocs in the country. In this interview, he
reiterates why Jonathan must urgently heed the call, saying
Niger-Deltans and, indeed, Nigerians, would not forgive him if he failed
to act decisively. He also argues that northern leaders are not doing
enough to stamp out Boko Haram and challenges former heads of state and
leaders from the North to end the insurgency by the sect.
Over the years, you have championed the call for the revocation of
oil blocs by the Federal Government on the grounds that the allocation
is lopsided. It was a contentious matter recently in the National
Assembly. What do you say?
Under the aegis of the Traditional Rulers of Oil Mineral Producing
States of Niger-Delta, TROMPCON, and one-time national executive
chairman, we had a lot of problems
coming from oil production in these areas and we noticed that in spite
of all the problems, we were able to contain the percentage of oil being
produced. However, it was discovered that for all the oil that is being
produced, a section of the country is benefiting most, especially as
oil now seems to be blood money. They do the manipulation mostly at the
political level where everybody wants to become a head of state or
president because when you are there, you control the economy.
Therefore, from the past years, we found out that North has ruled for
close to 40 years and, during the period, the heads of state or
presidents that came had the prerogative to issue out oil blocs and
they were not dispassionate – there was disequilibrium and they were
giving them to their own kith and kin. We noticed that an oil bloc
owner is having not less than N4 billion monthly and that money
goes to a private purse and, in Nigeria, we have what is known as
federal character. Whatever that is done, we do it with equity, the
issue of equity, fairness and justice is not applied in terms of the
allocation of oil blocs because most of the leaders came from the North
and it was given to them.
I can remember March 23, last year, when Vanguard interviewed me, I
reminded President Goodluck Jonathan that the allocation of oil blocs is
the prerogative of the president or head of state, and so he had to
look into it unemotionally and ensure that the lopsidedness in the
allocation that had bedeviled the oil industry is corrected.
Nevertheless, since the time I made the call, nothing has been done, and
whenever there is the issue of 13 percent derivation or PIB, as we saw
now, it is the North that will come and cry wolf, whereas they are the
people who have been benefiting.
Unfortunately, the principle of derivation has to do with a
percentage going to where the oil comes from and I am saying, with every
sense of reasoning, that President Jonathan should not spare a moment
to address the anomaly as regards the allocation of oil blocs. That is,
83 percent of oil blocs are owned by northerners, their names should be
published and he should revoke them and ensure that, as we have six
geo-political zones, 50 per cent should come to the South- south based
on derivative.
The rest has to be distributed to the other five geo-political
zones. It is only then we will know that federalism is being truly
practised in our federal system. I have said it often times, President
Jonathan should be courageous – he should step on toes, he should not be
seen as being unable to redress what his predecessors - Babangida,
Abacha, Abdulsalami , Obasanjo, Yar’Adua- had done wrong. Posterity and
the people of Niger-Delta will not forgive President Jonathan if he does
not take up this matter with all the seriousness it deserves to ensure
revocation and re-allocation of oil blocs.
You said he should step on toes. Do you not think the toes may consume him?
HRM Charles Ayemi-Botu
No. It is an anomaly and all and sundry have seen it that his
predecessors allocated these oil blocs to their own kindred irrespective
of the fact we are operating a federal character system and that what
is good for the goose is good for the gander. If they have done what is
seen to be foul, why must he not correct it if we want Nigeria to remain
as one entity? In the time of cocoa, groundnut and all that, the
South- south was not benefiting; some sections owned it all, the North
and West used it to develop their areas and nobody complained.
Now, it is the time of petrol- dollar, and we have acid rain,
ecological problems and we, in turn, do not have a commensurate amount
realized from all the sufferings and the money is going to those who do
not bear the hazards. How can you say it is fair and, mark you, the
North that is crying to rule this country, by crook or hook, it is all
because of oil and the oil economy is lopsided because, when they came
as presidents, they gave to their people.
Therefore, it has become a vicious circle, but once what is equitable
and fair is done, nobody will see oil blocs as the reason to battle to
become president. That is why Jonathan should step on toes. Nigeria
should realize that all the problems we are having today is because of
oil and blood money; whether it is Boko Haram, whether it is from the
Niger-Delta, it is all about oil. As Jonathan is doing everything
possible in the power sector to see that there is uninterrupted power
supply, he must go the extra mile to redress the imbalance.
Take for example, the Nigeria Petroleum Development Fund is in the
North, like we have Petroleum Training Institute in Effurun, Delta
State, the one for the senior cadre is in the North, how are you
carrying all these institutions to a place that does not produce oil?
Are we now going to create human capital development for a people who do
not have oil? You are clearly asking them to come and lord it over us? A
northerner was a petroleum minister for almost three or four
consecutive times and, today, he is an oil bloc owner and he does not
know the adverse effect of exploration and exploitation on the people
from where this oil is taken. However, he is taking away all these
billions and he is living in affluence and opulence in far-away Austria.
The president refused to grant Boko Haram members amnesty on the
grounds that they are ghosts, but the northerners have strongly
challenged his stand. What is your take?
Iit is an irony of fate that the governor of Borno State; Dr. Junaid
Mohammed and all these other people are making such comments. Let us
call a spade a spade. While I condemn the call by the Sultan, he is my
personal friend, for saying that we should grant amnesty to Boko Haram,
it is because what he said sounded very disheartening. Boko Haram is
not ready for peace, these are people who kill school children, bomb
school buildings while children are in class, bomb churches, bomb
mosques and they say they do not want western education .
Moreover, just recently, the leader of Boko Haram, Abu Shekerau, not
up 72 hours after a faction called for dialogue and amnesty, came out to
say that they never asked for dialogue or amnesty; that they did not
even ask for dialogue and it is a fight to the finish. Now, three days
later, his eminence came out to say that government should grant Boko
Haram amnesty. I know the Sultan would not have made such a call, many
people could have mounted pressure on him, but it sounds like a story
told by an idiot, full of sound and fury.
Unlike the struggle of the Niger-Delta youths that had focus, that
of Boko Haram is purposeless. We have come to know Boko Haram as a
faceless group with link to Al-Qaida and other terrorist groups, which
abhor western education. Their agitation has no moral basis and should
not be compared to the Niger-Delta struggle in which the youths took up
arms for equity in the distribution of wealth from oil explored in their
domain.
The focused struggle by the youths of N-Delta affected oil production
and government, having noted the point of their agitation, opted to
grant them amnesty. The reason was very succinct but that of Boko Haram
is vague and they are faceless. You can see the Boko Haram has continued
their bombings and killing more people in Kano. What kind of group is
that and these are the people that they are saying amnesty should be
granted to.
Can you really say it is a faceless group when you just mentioned its leader who came out to reject amnesty?
Where did you see him, on the pages of newspapers, on the television
or on the streets ? Do you know him as you know Tompolo and others? It
is what we read in the newspapers or told the international media,
which the Nigerian media quote. Let me ask the Sultan, who has he
identified as members and sponsors of Boko Haram that he wants Federal
Government to grant amnesty? If government concedes to such bogus
request, will he be able to name those that will be granted amnesty?
Alternatively, is amnesty to be granted to masquerades and Islamic
fundamentalists from Mali, Algeria and Al-Qaida? Who is government
going to dialogue with? What concrete efforts have the Sultan and other
leaders of the North made to stem the violence by Boko Haram before
calling for amnesty for the terrorists, who abhor western education, but
speak and send emails in English language?
As I said, I read that the leader of Boko Haram, Abu Shekarau, said
it is a fight to the finish. So, from whose authority or where did the
Sultan become the mouthpiece of a faceless group? Boko Haram wants to
Islamize Nigeria and scrap western education. Therefore, it is premature
to call for any well-meaning Nigerian to call for amnesty for the
group. On the contrary, Nigeria should declare a war against Boko Haram,
as France did to Malian insurgents. The Federal Government should
address its own problem before sending troops to Mali.
Northern leaders are unhappy that Jonathan asked them to fish out
Boko Haram members which, to them, is like he (president) abdicating his
duty?
Do you not know that the president asking for this moratorium was
himself given 60 days from August to October, 2009 to end the
Niger-Delta revolt? Let me ask you, when Tompolo, Ateke Tom, Boyloaf and
others were doing battle in Niger-Delta, was it Yar’Adua or Obasanjo
that fished them out? These people, if they are really fighting a just
cause, why are they faceless? The monarchs from the South- south,
religious leaders, etc, and himself, all stepped into the matter. Our
governors and leaders like Chief Edwin Clark moved into the creeks.
A meeting of the leaders of the militant groups was convened, all of
them, including Tompolo, Dokubo-Asari, Ateke Tom, were there to agree on
the way forward. On our part, the royal fathers resolved that they
should be a ceasefire and they should give peace a chance. What are the
efforts of the governor of Borno State and leaders to prevail on Boko
Haram to stop the carnage? What have the northern leaders discussed with
the Boko Haram people and what is the way forward from their
discussion?
This is how elders and leaders should act in a situation like this.
Do they want Jonathan to come to the North and commend them for not
talking to their boys and arriving at the way forward? They should fish
them out, we saw when former President Olusegun Obasanjo went to the
North on his own volition with a view to appeasing them to drop arms. I
have not heard that the Sultan did such a thing and you know this Boko
Haram started immediately when President Jonathan contested for the
2011 election and the likes of Muhammadu Buhari came up to say that he
would make Nigeria ungovernable if Jonathan wins. Votes were still being
counted when some places started catching fire in the North and, right
from that time till date, these things are happening. Remember that
before then, some northern leaders declared Aso Villa a no- go area for
Jonathan;so, to an extent, Boko Haram has a political dimension, it is
all with a view to making Nigeria ungovernable for President Jonathan.
The Federal Government asked Boko Haram people to come out for
dialogue; nobody came out, so why are people blaming Jonathan for saying
that they are faceless. Why have people like Alhaji Shehu Shagari,
General Buhari, Babangida, Abdulsalami not gone to the Boko Haram
members, wherever their headquarters is, to meet with their leaders
and tell them to sheathe their sword? The Sultan is the head of the
Muslim body in Nigeria, he is the supreme head and Boko Haram says they
want to Islamize Nigeria from the North to the West. Are the Boko Haram
members not living with them?
I think what the North wants to do with Boko Haram is to chase away
Jonathan so that they will come back and continue with their
perpetuation of the oil wealth. Those who are sponsoring Boko Haram do
not mean well and Jonathan said the home truth that they are
lackadaisical in tackling it because, they feel Jonathan will be run out
of Aso Villa with the violence. If this crisis escalates the more, they
are calling for disintegration of Nigeria, I have said it before, we
are likely going to have an Oduduwa Republic, Republic of Biafra, Ijaw
Republic and all that. To avoid that, the federal government should
declare a full-scale war on Boko Haram, appoint military administrators
in the affected states and let soldiers go house to house and fish out
the Boko Haram members since they do not want to point them out.
You are concentrating energy on the sharing of oil blocs, but the
North is saying that South- south governors are squandering the 13 per
cent derivation that is already coming to you people?
It is another story that sounds so funny, It is not the
responsibility of northerners to be crying wolf that the money is not
being well spent just because they want to stop the PIB. In the late
fifties and early sixties, the principle of derivation was 50 per cent
to the producing area, 50 per cent to the Federal Government and that
was agro economy. Did anybody from the South cast any aspersion against
the North or South-west on how they used their money to develop their
respective region?
It is not their business, it is not their duty. During the time of
agro economy, we were benefitting only from the 50 per cent that got to
the Federal Government, the 13 per cent derivation we are talking
about now is a tip of the ice berg. I was in the group that met with
the late General Sani Abacha and discussed that the hitherto 3 per cent
oil derivation be jerked up to 50 per cent. The general of blessed
memory said he was going to give us not less than 13 per cent as at that
1994 and there was a proviso that 25 per cent will be given in
subsequent times, until we make the 50 per cent because what is good
for the goose is good for the gander.
If at any time in the history of this country, a people or certain
sections were benefiting from the principle of derivation vis a vis agro
economy and now, God has turned the table round for oil to be the
mainstay of the economy, we should also benefit. 13 per cent compared to
50 per cent cannot be said to be up to 33 per cent of that 50 percent.
So, frankly, the North has no say about how the South is spending the
money because the inherent problems we face here, such as water and
airborne diseases, are not borne by them. 13 per cent is not enough to
cushion the effects of the problems the people face here, that is why we
are asking for 50 per cent and 10 per cent in the present PIB of
whatever accruable should be given to the actual oil-bearing
communities.
No comments:
Post a Comment